The ‘Saga’ of a ‘Baba’
Breathing exercises have their own intrinsic physiological benefits. Nonetheless, they are not substitutes for the conventional medical treatments.
Sharad’s Sunday Sojourns (week # 476 | 30th May 2021):
“Many ask me whether pranayama … postpones old age. Why worry about it? Death is certain. Let it come when it comes. Just keep working. The soul has no age. It doesn’t die. Only the body decays. And yet, we must never forget the body, since it is the garden we must cherish and cultivate.” … B.K.S. Iyengar.
While I have utmost faith on Yoga as a whole, and ‘pranayama’ as a significant subsidiary, I do have only a reserved sympathy and likeness towards its preachers.
While that may sound like concealed admiration, or denouncement, depending on the way you look at it (the glass is either half full or half empty), I can’t help it, considering effective preaching is often adulterated by cynical antipathy, as well as pseudo entrepreneurial traits, much of which lack substance!
Ramdev and Co. directed determinations to liberate India, via a colossal franchise, which engulfed a holistic approach towards alternate and complementary medicines, to achieve a healthy state and a healthy nation.
There is nothing wrong with that.
Even the resolute deniers of deep breathing exercises as well as yoga would accept their physiological benefits.
What actually brings the concerns and incredulities on the plate, are the commercial mannerisms associated with these simple practices.
Now, question may arise, what is wrong with that?
Anybody can build an organisation, or a franchise, and choose to highlight the pluses of a particular endeavour.
After all, every big company was once a tiny startup, wasn’t it?
That works pretty well within the ballpark of the Silicon Valley, you would admit.
But when it comes to a perpetual exertion to toss a pessimistic outburst directed solely towards the disadvantages of the conventional practice of medicine (read allopathy), I become suspicious.
Here are my concerns.
Let’s say that allopathy is marred with plethora of side effects, ultimately damaging the long-term health prospects of an individual.
Saying that, I have to then admit that alternative practices, including homeopathy, ayurveda, unani, must possess irrefutable testimonies via randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials to tackle a particular ailment.
Now, where are the conclusive evidence in favour of that?
Even in a country like Germany, serious concerns are progressively being raised over the uncompromising confirmations demonstrating the efficiency of complementary medicines.
And I have to consider that only Ramdev & Co. are truthful, and allopathy is fabricated?
Sorry folks, I am not optimistically predisposed!
What actually really makes me uncomfortable, is that what initially commenced as a simple, but sincere attempt to raise awareness regarding an overall, holistic approach to attain physical benefits, sans conventional drugs, slowly metamorphosed into a colossal business franchise, with a sole aim to make money!
Money is at the centerstage, and all the associated acts are just a mere showcase of demonstrative courses.
This is not enough, Babaji!
Allopathy is wrong!
‘Coronil’ cures corona!
Cow urine and cow dung shred off viruses from the body!
I mean, how long we have to bear all these bulls**t?
If Babaji keeps his focus solely on the practice of pranayama, I would gladly follow his course, without reservations.
But his childish tantrums, phenomenal illiteracy towards scientific conventions, baseless claims (drinking tea is equivalent to drinking alcohol), amongst many others, puts me at a crossroad junction with an ambiguous provocation:
Is he truly an emancipator, or just another ‘stone-thrower’, or even worse, an impostor?